• GL
Choose your location?
  • Global Global
  • Australia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Poland
  • Qatar
  • Spain
  • UAE
  • UK

Celebrity searching justifies dismissal

25 February 2021
Employees of financial and similar institutions who search for accounts of third parties without approval or legitimate reasons for doing so run the risk of being disciplined, up to and including termination of employment (Joanne Dinov v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd T/A ANZ Bank [2021] FWC 745).

Facts

The Applicant was a part-time personal banker who had been employed with the Respondent (the Bank) since July 2017. Her employment was terminated by payment in lieu of notice on 23 October 2020. 

The reasons for the dismissal included misusing the Bank's software to access the profiles of customers, family members, and a colleague, without approval or a legitimate business purpose on numerous occasions. The Applicant denied the allegations and claimed she did not know any of the people whose accounts were accessed, and had no reason to access the accounts of persons who were not known to her.

In evidence, the Applicant denied having conducted the searches although acknowledged her account had been used to do so. With respect to one name, that of a celebrity, the Applicant denied having any knowledge of the person.  The Applicant asserted it was possible that other employees at the branch had used her account by obtaining her password that she kept in her drawer, notwithstanding the password needed to be changed every 60 days. 

The Bank had a Prohibited Activities Policy which stated that employees must not use the Bank's systems to view accounts of their relatives or friends. It also prohibited the use of its systems for accessing the accounts of other employees of the Bank without a genuine business requirement to do so or permission from the accountholder, where appropriate. 

The Bank did not accept the explanation provided by the Applicant as being plausible or logical, and asserted that it was the Applicant that conducted the non-work related profile searches, as opposed to some unknown person. 

Decision

The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) found that the Applicant's explanations were implausible, and on the balance of probabilities found that the alleged misconduct was undertaken by the Applicant. The Commission further found the misconduct was a serious breach of the Bank's policies and provided a valid reason for the termination. 

The Commission noted that it was unlikely the Applicant would find employment in the banking industry for a period of at least five years. This was due to the Bank being required (under the Australian Bankers Association Better Banking Program) to reveal details of the Applicant's dismissal to the Applicant's prospective employers, who were major banks.  This was a requirement given the reasons for the Applicant's dismissal. However, these considerations were counter-balanced by the Applicant continuing to refute the reasons for her dismissal and not demonstrating any contrition.

The Commission found the Applicant's continued employment would undermine the values of the employer and the trust placed in it by its customers, and dismissed the application.

Conclusion

This case underlines for employers the value in having comprehensive policies which regulate employee behaviour that is specific to the industry. 

If you require further information or have any queries in relation to this legal update, please contact Mark Curran or Matthew Smith. 

Further Reading

We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

Manage cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

Functional cookies

(Required)

These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

These cookies are required

Tracking cookies

Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

Marketing cookies

These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.