• GL
Choose your location?
  • Global Global
  • Australia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Poland
  • Qatar
  • Spain
  • UAE
  • UK

DWF successfully advises on UK's first subsidy control case

16 August 2023

DWF, the global provider of integrated legal and business services, along with Brick Court Chambers, have successfully advised Durham County Council in the UK's first case brought under the Subsidy Control Act 2022.


The Subsidy Control Act 2022 regulates the lawfulness of financial assistance awarded by public authorities to organisations engaged in economic activity.  

In this landmark case, a commercial waste collection company, Max Recycle , alleged an unlawful subsidy arose from Durham County Council using the same bin lorries to collect commercial waste as for residential waste collections. 

In finding "no subsidy", the Competition Appeal Tribunal concluded:

  • when undertaking commercial waste collections in line with its statutory duty the Council should not be considered to be engaged in economic activity;
  • as the Council was obliged to apply a reasonable charge for commercial waste collection services, any advantage would accrue to the customers not the Council; and
  • no “enforceable right" to the financial assistance could arise within the Council.

Jonathan Branton, partner and Head of Public Sector at DWF, said: "This is a landmark post-Brexit law case as the first time in which the UK's own Subsidy Control Act 2022 has been addressed by the Court rather than EU State aid law or an EU/UK Treaty.  

"Public sector bodies will welcome the Competition Appeal Tribunal's decision which confirmed the lawfulness of using one set of bin lorries to collect residential and commercial waste. Undoubtedly there will be many more subsidy challenges in the coming years which develop the law further."

The DWF team consisted of Jonathan Branton and Alexander Rose advising on subsidy control and Joel Heap, Michelle Maher and Elinor Jackson having conduct of the litigation.

Full judgment: The Durham Company Limited v Durham County Council

Further Reading