• GL
Choose your location?
  • Global Global
  • Australia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Poland
  • Qatar
  • Spain
  • UAE
  • UK

Let the punishment fit the crime: a lesson in proportionality in disciplinary action

12 September 2019
Man in a skyscaper looking out to the city

Unfair dismissals can be tricky - does the punishment fit the crime? This article explores the importance of proportionality in disciplinary action.

Procedural fairness is the foundation of any disciplinary process, however the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has issued a timely reminder for employers not to overlook the importance of proportionality when determining what disciplinary action to take.

Put simply, the punishment must fit the crime or you could find yourself on the receiving end of an unfair dismissal application.

 

The decision:

In Murkitt v Staysafe Security T/A Alarmnet Monitoring [2019] FWC 5622, Alarmnet relied on its social media policy and a provision within Ms Murkitt’s employment contract that she “not intentionally do anything that is or may be harmful to the Company” to summarily dismiss its longtime employee, Ms Murkitt, after she posted a Facebook post highly critical of her employers new management.

Alarmnet ticked all the right boxes in terms of its disciplinary process:

  • Was there a valid reason for the dismissal?
  • Was the employee notified of the reason for the dismissal?
  • Has the employee been given an opportunity to respond?

However, Alarmnet did not go that step further and consider, in the context of Ms Murkitt’s employment history and personal circumstances, whether her actions were sufficiently serious to warrant summary dismissal. This is where things unraveled for Alarmnet and their dismissal of Ms Murkitt was found to be harsh in such circumstances.

 

What factors were considered relevant in the FWC's determination that the dismissal was unfair?

It is important to note that the particular circumstances to be considered when determining the proportionality of the disciplinary action will differ on a case by case basis. However, this decision gives employers some guidance as to the types of factors to consider:

  • Length of service: Ms Murkitt had been employed by Alarmnet (and its predecessor) for almost 15 years;
  • Mental health: Ms Murkitt was suffering from a psychological condition known to Alarmnet at the time;
  • Lack of remorse/taking responsibility for actions;
  • Lack of previous performance issues: the Facebook post was a single ‘one-off’ event and Ms Murkitt did not have a history of poor performance; and
  • Financial harm: Alarmnet suffered no financial harm as a result of the post.

As Alarmnet found out, it is important that employers do not overlook the importance of the principle of proportionality when taking disciplinary action against an employee, particularly where that action could result in dismissal.

If you require further information or have any queries in relation to this legal update, please contact Sina Zevari


We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Nicole Davis and Brittany Turner to this article.

Further Reading

We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

Manage cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

Functional cookies

(Required)

These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

These cookies are required

Tracking cookies

Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

Marketing cookies

These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.