• GL
Choose your location?
  • Global Global
  • Australia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Poland
  • Qatar
  • Spain
  • UAE
  • UK

Holiday pay: The latest case on non guaranteed and voluntary overtime

13 July 2018
Glass enclave reception area of a corporate building
In the case of Flowers and others v East of England Ambulance Trust ("the Trust") the Employment Appeal Tribunal ("EAT") has found that employees of the Trust were entitled to have both non-guaranteed overtime and voluntary overtime taken into account when calculating holiday pay.

The EAT considered the overtime payments from both a contractual and a Working Time Directive ("WTD") perspective (WTD rather than Working Time Regulations 1999 ("WTR") as the Trust is an emanation of the state and so the WTD has direct effect).


The current case centred on holiday pay claims brought by the Trust's employees arguing that their holiday pay calculation had failed to include

  • Non-guaranteed overtime.
  • Voluntary overtime. 

The non-guaranteed overtime occurs when an employee is at the end of a shift but is in the middle of a job which must be completed. The voluntary overtime occurs where an employee genuinely volunteers for an extra shift.

The clause in question 

Clause 13.9 of the NHS contract states:

"Pay during annual leave will include regularly paid supplements, including any recruitment and retention premia, payments for work outside normal hours and high cost area supplements. Pay is calculated on the basis of what the individual would have received had he/she been at work. This would be based on the previous three months at work or any other reference period that may be locally agreed."

The Employment Tribunal

From a contractual perspective the Tribunal found that non-guaranteed overtime should be included in the holiday pay calculation but that voluntary overtime should not.

The Trust conceded the WTD claim in respect of non-guaranteed overtime following Bear Scotland v Fulton.

 Under the WTD the Tribunal noted the concession of the Trust that non-guaranteed overtime should be included in the holiday pay calculation but found that voluntary overtime was not normal remuneration and so need not be taken into account.

The employees appealed against the voluntary overtime finding and the Trust cross-appealed against the contractual non-guaranteed overtime finding.

The EAT 

When considering the contractual claim the EAT found that the correct holiday pay calculation should include all overtime worked, whether non-guaranteed or voluntary. The purpose of clause 13.9 was to ensure the employee received holiday pay in line with what he/she would have received had they been in work, based on a three month reference period (or as otherwise agreed).

When considering the WTD claim the EAT focused on the case of Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willets which confirmed the overarching principle that normal remuneration must be maintained in respect of annual leave, as guaranteed by Article 7 of the WTD.

The EAT in the current case made it clear that it was "wrong to hold that voluntary overtime necessarily fell outside the calculation of annual leave pay under the WTD". The claims would need to be remitted for a case-by-case assessment to consider whether the pattern of voluntary overtime was paid with sufficient regularity to constitute "normal pay".


The outcome of this case is unsurprising following the EAT decision in Dudley. However, employers should be careful with regard to any contractual obligations which they create. Under the WTD voluntary overtime need only be included in the calculation when it is considered normal remuneration (paid with sufficient regularity etc). However, well-intentioned but not properly thought out wording in a contract may inadvertently create contractual rights to holiday pay that includes voluntary overtime regardless of whether it is paid with sufficient regularity.

Consequently, as a result of this case, employers need to be mindful of creating express contractual rights to holiday pay and the possibility of a breach of contract claim resulting in:

  • the more favourable six year limitation period (five in Scotland);
  • the absence of the rule that a period of three months or more between underpayments results in earlier underpayments being excluded; and
  • the absence of the two year back stop rule on unlawful deductions from wages claims.

We understand an appeal is being sought.

Further Reading

We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

Manage cookies

Your Privacy

When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

Functional cookies


These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

These cookies are required

Tracking cookies

Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

Marketing cookies

These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.